Skip to content

Conversation

ldecicco-USGS
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jread-usgs check out this function and tell me if I re-invented some other function

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, we don't have something like this. views(gsplot) just returns the views (removes the other top level things like par and legend).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool. It's kind of handy, might be useful for more than just axis.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

camelCase..?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, hard habit to break. I'll quick change it. We are doing _ for functions and . for arguments, right?

@ldecicco-USGS
Copy link
Member Author

OK, the pressure to not reduce the coverage is great. Anyway, I'm done. If someone wants to poke around before merging, cool. Otherwise, you can play with the axis examples to see if it acts the way you think it should act.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like grid happens on top of axis(side=1) in unnamed-chunk-2-1.png, which is why there is a diff for that file. Odd that it doesn't matter for side=3.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's actually due to not ordering the views anymore. We use to put the bgCol first, then grid, then the rest. I'm planning to move those to a top level thing like axis and par (see #239 ) .

@jordansread
Copy link
Member

Looks great to me. I'd say 👍 for merge

ldecicco-USGS added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2015
@ldecicco-USGS ldecicco-USGS merged commit f911146 into USGS-R:master Oct 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants