Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ROM config for gf180mcu #225

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024
Merged

Add ROM config for gf180mcu #225

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

mole99
Copy link
Contributor

@mole99 mole99 commented Feb 3, 2024

Since OpenROM has experimental support for gf180mcuD, I think it would be useful to have a test to make sure it does not break in the future.

This PR adds one config for: gf180mcu_rom_1kbyte.

For now, I disabled check_lvsdrc for gf180mcu as it seems the magic version installed via conda is too old.
Maybe the tools/PDK versions that OpenRAM uses can be updated in the future.

Also, when writing rom_data, it makes sure that the output directory exists.

I created the variable lef_rom_interconnect to specify the metal layers for lef writing.
Maybe you know a better name for it ;)

@mole99
Copy link
Contributor Author

mole99 commented Mar 11, 2024

Hi, just wanted to check the status on this! Is there anything that I can do?

@mguthaus
Copy link
Collaborator

Haven't made progress due to other impending deadlines. Sorry. We will get to it soon.

@mole99
Copy link
Contributor Author

mole99 commented Mar 12, 2024

No problem! Good to know that it's on the radar, thanks 😃️

@vlsida-bot vlsida-bot merged commit 0937f86 into VLSIDA:dev Mar 26, 2024
@mguthaus
Copy link
Collaborator

It seems some regressions broke, so it's in dev but not stable yet.

@mole99
Copy link
Contributor Author

mole99 commented Mar 26, 2024

Oh no! From what I can remember, it worked for me locally. Please let me know if I can help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants