Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

accessibility features with alt images and comment in user.html #1972

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

qtop1
Copy link

@qtop1 qtop1 commented May 13, 2024

Proposed changes

Checklist

  • [x ] Lint and unit tests pass locally with my changes.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have added documentation to describe my feature.
  • I have squashed my commits into logic units.
  • [x ] I have described the changes in the commit messages.

Other information

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.35%. Comparing base (add3295) to head (2a5220b).
Report is 471 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1972      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.28%   82.35%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        2771     2771              
  Branches      411      411              
==========================================
+ Hits         2280     2282       +2     
+ Misses        390      389       -1     
+ Partials      101      100       -1     

<a class="button inline" href="{% url "support" %}">{% trans "Get support" %}</a>
<!-- Button to get support with translation support -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really don't find these comments useful. Comments are for things which you can not easily see from the code, but this more looks like a comment generated from the code.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These files are not desired in the repository.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the feedback. Just for some context, are the files that include the alt image not helpful also? If I remove the comments from the user.html and leave the rest, would that be ok?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Having useful alt for content images is definitely helpful. For some, it might be just better to not pollute screen reader with them (for example icons on the features pages). Read https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/231898341/is-alt-on-image-a-must-have?hl=en to see where alt is not actually desired.

Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because there wasn’t any recent activity.

It will be closed soon if no further action occurs.

Thank you for your contributions!

@github-actions github-actions bot added wontfix Nobody will work on this. and removed wontfix Nobody will work on this. labels Jun 19, 2024
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because there wasn’t any recent activity.

It will be closed soon if no further action occurs.

Thank you for your contributions!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the wontfix Nobody will work on this. label Aug 11, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Aug 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wontfix Nobody will work on this.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants