Skip to content

`libsqlite3-sys` via C SQLite improperly validates array index

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 4, 2022 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Mar 27, 2024

Package

cargo libsqlite3-sys (Rust)

Affected versions

< 0.25.1

Patched versions

0.25.1

Description

SQLite 1.0.12 through 3.39.x before 3.39.2 sometimes allows an array-bounds overflow if billions of bytes are used in a string argument to a C API.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Aug 3, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 4, 2022
Reviewed Feb 15, 2023
Last updated Mar 27, 2024

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

0.329%
(71st percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2022-35737

GHSA ID

GHSA-jw36-hf63-69r9

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.