fix: order transaction summary types #490
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Updated tests that were failing. |
neilcampbell
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2025
engineering-ci bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2025
## [2.0.9-beta.5](v2.0.9-beta.4...v2.0.9-beta.5) (2025-09-05) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes * order transaction summary types ([#490](#490)) ([fc1b3b3](fc1b3b3))
engineering-ci bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2025
## [2.1.0](v2.0.8...v2.1.0) (2025-09-27) ### ⏪ Reverts * ak utils future ([#489](#489)) ([ada3049](ada3049)), closes [#422](#422) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes * order transaction summary types ([#490](#490)) ([fc1b3b3](fc1b3b3)) * update algosdk to latest to ensure new transaction fields are accounted for ([#501](#501)) ([1616db8](1616db8)) ### 🚀 Features * add support for rendering arc62 circulating supply of an asset ([68074c9](68074c9))
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Whilst looking through various blocks, it was annoying to see the same transaction types jumping around depending on the order of the transactions in the block. This PR means they will always be returned in the same order (if they exist).