Containers.all() + unit test

[amihaiemil]

PR for #161, added option to fetch all containers, not only the running ones.

[amihaiemil]

@wem Here is the PR with the changes, WDYT?

Actually, this is not the most correct solution (from an object-oriented perspective). We should in fact have a new implementation of the Containers interface (we would then have 2 implementations: RunningContainers and AllContainers, both extending RtContainers and providing their custom iterators)... but let's leave it like this for now, maybe we'll change it later.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 302

• 6 of 6 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 82.051%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 300:	0.2%
Covered Lines:	416
Relevant Lines:	507

---

💛 - Coveralls

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 304

• 6 of 6 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 82.051%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 300:	0.2%
Covered Lines:	416
Relevant Lines:	507

---

💛 - Coveralls

[0crat]

Job #162 is now in scope, role is REV

[0crat]

This pull request #162 is assigned to @llorllale/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @amihaiemil/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[llorllale]

@amihaiemil we should then add a note here saying that this Iterable by default returns only the running containers

[llorllale]

@amihaiemil I think it would be better if we add the "only running containers" note at the class javadoc and remove the text in these parenthesis

[llorllale]

@amihaiemil

We should in fact have a new implementation of the Containers interface (we would then have 2 implementations: RunningContainers and AllContainers, both extending RtContainers and providing their custom iterators)

Perhaps leave a puzzle then?

[amihaiemil]

@llorllale I updated the Javadocs. I don't want ot leave a puzzle now, since I'm not sure it's a good idea entirely... I'll think about it and we see later :)

[llorllale]

@amihaiemil ok, looks good then

[amihaiemil]

@rultor merge it

[rultor]

@rultor merge it

@amihaiemil OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

[rultor]

@rultor merge it

@amihaiemil Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 3min)

[0crat]

Job was finished in 1 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36)

[0crat]

The job #162 is now out of scope

[0crat]

Order was finished: +20 point(s) just awarded to @llorllale/z

[0crat]

Payment to ARC for a closed pull request, as in §28: +10 point(s) just awarded to @amihaiemil/z