Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kamel run - compile errors should be more visible #185

Closed
davsclaus opened this issue Oct 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

kamel run - compile errors should be more visible #185

davsclaus opened this issue Oct 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/observability Logging, monitoring and tracing
Milestone

Comments

@davsclaus
Copy link
Contributor

I made a mistake in the runtime/example/Sample.java file where the \n new line escape was changed to \C which would cause the java code to compile error. But I could not really see that too well.

This is just a ticket to remember to look into this and see if its really the case and if so make it report it better to the log output.

@orpiske
Copy link
Contributor

orpiske commented Apr 22, 2021

I wonder if the kamel dump is enough to cover this. Any thoughts?

@orpiske orpiske self-assigned this May 3, 2021
@orpiske orpiske added the area/observability Logging, monitoring and tracing label May 3, 2021
@orpiske orpiske added this to the 1.5.0 milestone May 3, 2021
@orpiske
Copy link
Contributor

orpiske commented May 3, 2021

The features added with the new logging trait for 1.5 (and backported to 1.4) along w/ the kamel dump should alleviate this problem (if not resolving it altogether) ... . As such, I'm closing this one.

@orpiske orpiske closed this as completed May 3, 2021
claudio4j added a commit to claudio4j/camel-k that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2024
…abels

CMLK-1872: Fix manifest generation: don't modify the labels of selector (2.2.x)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/observability Logging, monitoring and tracing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants