Skip to content

Conversation

dsmiley
Copy link
Contributor

@dsmiley dsmiley commented Oct 23, 2019

Passes tests. There's a nocommit comment on wether a distributed scenario should not propagate the finish() call. It was not in the past (checked via null "nodes" field), but I think it should always propagate because even if "nodes" is null processAdd might pass on through a particular document if it's local to the shard receiving the request. @yonik WDYT?

@dsmiley dsmiley closed this in 3ae8204 Oct 23, 2019
dsmiley added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2019
Important since Run URP finish() propagates to updateLog to fsync()!
Closes #969

(cherry picked from commit 3ae8204)
dsmiley added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2019
Important since Run URP finish() propagates to updateLog to fsync()!
Closes #969

(cherry picked from commit 3ae8204)
@dsmiley dsmiley deleted the solr13855 branch August 2, 2023 22:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant