Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Walk back deprecation of TO APIv3, add instability warnings for 4.0 #6209

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 15, 2021

Conversation

ocket8888
Copy link
Contributor

With the recent discussion on the mailing list we've decided to move forward with TO APIv4 being "unstable", which means that APIv3 - being the latest stable version - cannot be deprecated. This PR walks back changes made to deprecate it, and adds a couple of warnings about the instability of TO API v4.


Which Traffic Control components are affected by this PR?

  • Documentation

What is the best way to verify this PR?

Read the warnings, make sure docs build correctly, etc.

PR submission checklist

  • Docs don't have tests
  • This PR has documentation
  • This PR has a CHANGELOG.md entry
  • This PR DOES NOT FIX A SERIOUS SECURITY VULNERABILITY

@ocket8888 ocket8888 added documentation related to documentation tech debt rework due to choosing easy/limited solution labels Sep 14, 2021
@ocket8888 ocket8888 added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 14, 2021
@rawlinp rawlinp merged commit 7d67421 into apache:master Sep 15, 2021
zrhoffman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2021
…6209)

* Walk back deprecation of TO APIv3, add instability warnings for 4.0

* Update client READMEs

(cherry picked from commit 7d67421)
@ocket8888 ocket8888 deleted the docs/api-instability-warning branch September 15, 2021 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation related to documentation tech debt rework due to choosing easy/limited solution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants