Created documentation generation using Sphinx and ReadTheDocs

[dolphingarlic]

This is for that one GCI task

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 235

• 7 of 8 (87.5%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+1.08%) to 80.441%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
apertium/init.py	2	3	66.67%

Totals
Change from base Build 221:	1.08%
Covered Lines:	584
Relevant Lines:	726

---

💛 - Coveralls

[dolphingarlic]

Should I be worrying about these Travis CI issues?

[sushain97]

I don't merge PRs that fail the build if it was passing before unless it's not your fault :)

[dolphingarlic]

Here's what I get when I run "mypy -p apertium --ignore-missing-imports --txt-report coverage" on the files with the docstrings:

Mypy Type Check Coverage Summary

Script: index

+----------------------+-------------------+---------+
| Module | Imprecision | Lines |
+----------------------+-------------------+---------+
| apertium | 0.00% imprecise | 46 LOC |
| apertium.analysis | 8.86% imprecise | 79 LOC |
| apertium.generation | 0.00% imprecise | 65 LOC |
| apertium.mode_search | 0.00% imprecise | 88 LOC |
| apertium.translation | 5.85% imprecise | 188 LOC |
| apertium.utils | 1.49% imprecise | 67 LOC |
+----------------------+-------------------+---------+
| Total | 3.56% imprecise | 533 LOC |
+----------------------+-------------------+---------+

[sushain97]

There's also a random swap file?