-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 416
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
probes: improve probes by having specific getters #3710
probes: improve probes by having specific getters #3710
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, put some comments.
currProbe := t.probes.GetProbeByHandle(depProbes.GetHandle()) | ||
|
||
name := "" | ||
switch p := currProbe.(type) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps to assign and check the coercion for errors before the switch?
// Only k[ret]probes may use ftrace | ||
if kprobesOnly { | ||
switch p.GetProbeType() { | ||
case probes.KProbe, probes.KretProbe: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's a no-op case, perhaps a comment to make it evident?
One may debug self loaded function by using:
For example: