Skip to content

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented Mar 18, 2021

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull Requests
    before creating one)
  • The PR follows
    our contributing guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • UPGRADING.md has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)
  • What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug fix

  • What is the current behavior?

The "waiting for feedback" label was renamed "status: waiting for information" to comply with the standardized tooling
label system, but this label name was missed when updating the workflow to reflect the change (#1213).

  • What is the new behavior?

The correct issue label is used to enable the stale bot.

No breaking change.

  • Other information:

https://github.com/arduino/arduino-cli/labels?q=%22status%3A+waiting+for+information%22

…label

The "waiting for feedback" label was renamed "status: waiting for information" to comply with the standardized tooling
label system, but this label name was missed when updating the workflow to reflect the change.
@per1234 per1234 added type: bug priority: low Resolution is a low priority topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure labels Mar 18, 2021
@per1234 per1234 requested review from silvanocerza and rsora March 18, 2021 06:47
@per1234 per1234 merged commit ab92281 into arduino:master Mar 18, 2021
@per1234 per1234 deleted the fix-stale-bot branch March 18, 2021 08:15
@rsora rsora added criticality: low Of low impact and removed priority: low Resolution is a low priority labels Nov 2, 2021
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Nov 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
criticality: low Of low impact topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants