You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm an application which takes an "manif" manifold as a template parameter. This works nicely, since the basic interface, accessors and methods are naturally the same for all manifolds.
However, it fails as soon as I want to operate in Euclidean space. What is missing, is essentially a manif-implementation of the must fundamental n-dimensional Euclidean manifold E(n), in which case anything within manif should fall back to the natural Eigen-types and methods.
Is there any plan to add such a feature?
Best, and thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We've been discussing for a while the topics you are raising. For the R^n manifolds, or E(n), they should be easy to implement since they are mostly trivial.
We'll discuss soon about this possibility. We'll keep you posted here.
@markusgft thanks for your interest in manif!
Implementing the E(n) manifolds has been on my todo-list for a while now but I did not have a use for it outside of the infamous composite manifolds (#84). Given your interest in those I will start looking at the implementation asap.
Best.
Dear all,
I'm an application which takes an "manif" manifold as a template parameter. This works nicely, since the basic interface, accessors and methods are naturally the same for all manifolds.
However, it fails as soon as I want to operate in Euclidean space. What is missing, is essentially a manif-implementation of the must fundamental n-dimensional Euclidean manifold E(n), in which case anything within manif should fall back to the natural Eigen-types and methods.
Is there any plan to add such a feature?
Best, and thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: