Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typo(?) for Jacobian of o-minus in the cheat sheet #285

Closed
blue-ringed-octopus opened this issue Feb 26, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #286
Closed

Typo(?) for Jacobian of o-minus in the cheat sheet #285

blue-ringed-octopus opened this issue Feb 26, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #286

Comments

@blue-ringed-octopus
Copy link

blue-ringed-octopus commented Feb 26, 2024

the jacobian shows
$J^{\mathcal{\gamma}\ominus\mathcal{\chi}}_{\tau} = J_r^{-1}(\tau)$

is it supposed to mean
$J^{\mathcal{\gamma}\ominus\mathcal{\chi}}_{\mathcal{\gamma}} = J_r^{-1}(\tau)$ ?

I assume
$\tau = \mathcal{\gamma} \ominus \mathcal{\chi}$

@joansola
Copy link
Collaborator

joansola commented Feb 26, 2024

imagen

directly from the paper.

Where did you find the formula that you posted?

@blue-ringed-octopus
Copy link
Author

thank you for the reply, i found it on here
https://github.com/artivis/manif/blob/devel/paper/Lie_theory_cheat_sheet.pdf

the right jacobian of right- $\ominus $

@joansola
Copy link
Collaborator

Nice catch! We'll fix it, thank you!

@joansola
Copy link
Collaborator

@artivis would you take care of this fix? I am not sure if I have access to the latex sources

@joansola
Copy link
Collaborator

@artivis I did change the latex sources in overleaf. However the version there and the one on github are quite different. So I did not push the changes here. I let you do it.

FYI: In the sources, I re-defined \bfMx and \bfMy to produce \mathcal{X} and \mathcal{Y} respectively, as in the paper.

@artivis
Copy link
Owner

artivis commented Feb 27, 2024

Thanks for the ping.

I'll update the pdf asap 👍.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants