Repository navigation
Releases
v0.3.0
Auto-released from the merge of #27 (trigger: push).
Merge gates: what stands between a pull request and the default branch.
- merges do not wait for any check: pull requests get checks, but no ruleset or branch
protection requires one, so a red pull request can merge. - required checks no pull request reports: a required check name that no recent pull request
produced, such as a renamed job or a path-filtered workflow. GitHub waits for it forever. - pull request checks merges do not wait for: a test, build, analysis or fuzzing check that pull
requests get but the branch doesn't require. This is a guard, judged from the check's name. - no workflow checks pull requests, no code scanning, no dependency updates: the
workflows a supply-chain review expects, when the listings show they are missing.
Checked against 1,224 workflow files from 40 popular repositories (no crash, no parse failure,
and every untrusted expression found in a script was one the scan reports):
- Unpinned references by owner: the evidence says who can move each reference: a third
party, the repository's owner, GitHub, or the repository itself. The repository's own reusable
workflow at a branch gets a local./call as its example, which runs from the caller's commit
and needs no pin. Its own step actions are pinned like the owner's others. - More code scanners: Semgrep, Snyk, SonarSource's scan actions, Bearer (by action, container
image or command) and code-scanner SARIF uploads now count as code scanning. Scorecard and
workflow-linter uploads don't, and neither does SonarSource's quality-gate action. - One parse per file: within an audit, each distinct workflow file is parsed once and shared
by the measurements, the scans and the gate checks. The parses are dropped when the audit ends. - Each guard says what it guards against: the required-checks guard read "a guard against
hung jobs", the timeout finding's wording, and the summary counted it among them. Each guard
now names its own purpose, and one unrequired check reads in the singular. - Grouped findings show each workflow's figure: a self-hosted tail, toolchain setup, queue
wait or short-hosted-jobs finding found in several workflows gave the largest workflow's figure
and "the same holds in the others". The evidence now gives each workflow's own figure and
saving, largest first, and marks a workflow timed from only a few successful runs. - No billing claim on a free runner: the timeout finding said a hung run bills every minute
on a public repository too, whose standard hosted runners are free; it now says so only where
the minutes are billed. - One timeout finding: jobs without a working timeout in several workflows are one finding,
naming each job with its workflow, with an example block for each workflow file, instead of one
finding per workflow.
Required checks come from the default branch's rulesets and protection summary, which every
token can read. A pull request's checks are the jobs of each workflow's newest pull request run,
already read for timing when sampled. When something can't be read, nothing is claimed.
Built, tested and packed by publish.yml on this run; the tarball attached here carries a keyless Sigstore build attestation (gh attestation verify <tarball> --owner askalf).
v0.2.0
Auto-released from the merge of #19 (trigger: push).
Faster audits:
-
Requests now run up to six at a time, and the work that doesn't depend on order is overlapped:
- the remaining run pages, once the first page gives the count;
- every sampled run's jobs;
- the workflow files;
- the repository's metadata and listings.
Measured on three real repositories, an audit went from 33 s to 9.5 s and from 21 s to 7 s, with
the same API calls. -
The 25-call reserve holds with requests in flight: each one counts as spent until it is answered,
and an answer that arrives late with an older, higher count doesn't raise it. -
A run that moves between pages while they are read is counted once.
Security review (hostile input from the audited repository):
- No more slow matching. A long unterminated
${{in a workflow value took minutes to hours to
match, and a long job name took seconds. Both checks are now linear (prefix and suffix tests,
and in-order literal search). - Report text stays text. Every workflow, job, step and file name in the markdown report and in
comparedisplays as written: no new heading, no HTML or hidden comment, no link or tracking
image, no terminal control codes. A bare URL or email address, which GitHub would link by itself,
is shown as code. Example blocks can't close their own fence. - The token goes to
GITHUB_API_URL(https only). On GitHub Enterprise Server or GHE.com it no
longer goes to api.github.com. - Requests are bounded. File paths are percent-encoded,
.and..aren't accepted as an owner
or repository name, each request has a 30 s deadline, and an answer over 20 MB is an error (an
error answer is read only up to 64 KB). - The injection scan reads more fields: a
workflow_run's display title and its pull requests'
head refs, committer names and emails, and head repository descriptions. It also follows
untrusted text throughenv:, so${{ env.TITLE }}counts whenTITLEholds one of these.
The report says what the scans don't check. - The HTML report loads no web fonts, so opening it contacts no one.
- The README notes that the GitHub CLI's token usually has write scope, and that a fine-grained
read-only token is enough.
Found by auditing real repositories:
- A workflow is labelled with its own name from the workflows API. The list is read page by page
until every workflow the runs name is found; that is usually one call. A workflow with
run-name:names each run after its pull request, so the most common run name could be a pull
request's title. If the workflows answer can't be read, the run names still label it. - The repository root is listed as
contents, notcontents/. The trailing slash is not the
documented form, and a proxy in front of the API refused it. - Behind a proxy, the CLI and the action now use it. Node's fetch ignores
HTTPS_PROXYunless
NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY=1is set at start-up, so every call went direct and failed (a 401, or no
connection). When a proxy is set, they run themselves again with the switch on (Node 22.21 and
later). On an older Node they warn that the proxy is ignored.
Security scans of every workflow file (up to 30, not only the sampled workflows'):
- actions not pinned to a commit: a step or reusable-workflow
uses:on a tag or branch, which
can be moved to other code, with third-party and GitHub's own actions told apart. The fix pins
the full SHA with the tag in a comment. - untrusted input in a script: a
run:script or github-scriptscriptthat interpolates a
title, body, comment, commit message or author, or a head branch name, per GitHub's hardening
guide. The expression is parsed, so only one whose value carries that text counts: a
contains(...)test, a comparison, a field that only picks a branch (title && 'yes' || 'no') or a
quoted field name does not, and property names match in any case. The example is the
pattern on the step it names (the expression inenv:, the variable read in the step's language),
and the fix names what a variable does not fix: a second parser, an option that runs a program,
an env file, a dash-led argument. - job token wider than the job:
permissions: write-all(confirmed), or no permissions block,
leaving the repository's default token (inferred), including a reusable-workflow call that hands
the caller's token on. The fix is a read-only default, widened per job. - All three are risks, ranked first. The report says how many workflow files the scans read, of how
many listed, and names any that could not be read; when the directory cannot be listed it says the
total is unknown.
Measurement precision:
- A weekly total is now a count times a mean, never a median: run times are skewed by a few long
runs, and the median understated the week. The table's per-run figure stays the median, labelled
typical; the savings that multiply a per-run cost (duplicates, outdated runs, reruns) use the mean. - Every outcome is costed at its own measured cost: up to two failed, cancelled and timed-out runs
per sampled workflow are timed beside the successes (cost_by_outcomein the JSON), since a
failure often stops early and a timeout runs to its limit. An outcome with no sampled run is
costed like a success and named in the report. Runs that ran no job (skipped, waiting for
approval, failed to start, stale) cost nothing.
Recommendations:
- New rule jobs without a working timeout: a job with no
timeout-minutes(GitHub's default is
360 minutes), or one more than 10 times its longest sampled run, gets a limit from its own runs:
3 times the longest, rounded up to 5 minutes, at least 10. Matrix legs are matched to their job.
Reported as a guard against hung jobs (guardunit), not a saving.
Self-hosted runners (the askalf/pitlane method, measured):
- New rule fork pull requests run on self-hosted runners: each job's
ifandruns-onare
evaluated as GitHub would for a pull request from a fork (a small evaluator for the expression
language,src/expr.mjs), so a guard counts by what it does: a job that picks a self-hosted
runner for a fork is a risk, one whoseifis false for it or whoseruns-onsends it to a
GitHub-hosted runner is not. A value the audit cannot resolve (vars,matrix) makes it
possible, not confirmed. The example wraps the job's own runner selection unchanged. - New rule self-hosted runners reused across jobs: a runner id that took two or more sampled
jobs is a persistent runner, whose workspace and state carry between jobs. An ephemeral row that
keeps its name but registers anew each job is not reuse. - Both carry a
riskunit: they rank before every saving, lead the report under "Start with", and
the summary counts them as risks to fix before any saving.
API budget:
- When GitHub sends its
x-ratelimit-limitheader, the report states the budget the audit drew on: the calls
made and what the token had left of its hourly limit ("41 API calls, 959 of 1000 left this
hour"), in the CLI's summary line, the action's log, the report's "How it was measured" and the
JSON (rate_limit). On a budget of 1,000 or less it names the larger one: a GitHub App's
installation token, 5,000 or more an hour. - A stop near the rate limit says the hourly limit it hit and how to get a larger budget.
- The README's "Rate limits" section sets up a GitHub App token for the action, with the pinned
actions/create-github-app-tokenstep and the two read permissions an audit needs.
Expert guidance:
- Every finding now carries its trade-off in the report, as docs/rules.md always described, and,
where the fix is a change to the workflow file, the YAML for it: the setup action's cache input
for the package manager the workflow installs with (npm, pnpm, yarn, pip, poetry, pipenv, uv,
go, bundler) or an actions/cache step keyed on the lockfile (cargo, bun, npm with no lockfile),
the concurrency block, the push trigger, or the checkout inputs. - slow checkout reads the checkout step:
fetch-depth: 0, afetch-depthabove 1,lfs,
submodulesorfetch-tagsare named as the cause (confirmed); a default checkout, which
already fetches one commit, is no longer told to setfetch-depth: 1, and gets sparse-checkout
instead (inferred); with no checkout step to read, or a depth set by an expression, the cause is
reported as unknown. - The same-commit-twice rule reads the repository's default branch (one more API call): the push
trigger example names it, and when it cannot be read says to fill it in, instead of assuming
main, which would switch off push CI on a repository whose default branch is develop. comparereports a finding that is gone in its own unit (job-minutes, billed minutes or
developer wait), not always as job-minutes.- The outdated-runs fix no longer suggests an inline
{ group: ${{ ... }} }concurrency mapping,
which is not valid YAML; the example is a block.
Measurement:
- Runs are grouped by workflow id, not by run name. A pull request that adds a workflow gives its
runs the pull request's title, which split one workflow into two rows (this repository's Fuzz
appeared twice, once as "[hold] Fuzz the workflow, …"). Each workflow is labelled with the name
most of its runs carry; two workflows sharing a name get their path appended. - A finding that saves under 1 minute a week is left out. Queue wait and matrix size carry a
waitunit and stay, reported as developer wait; before, any saving that rounded below 1 was
mislabelled as developer wait. - Billed minutes: GitHub bills each hosted job rounded up to a whole minute. Each workflow
getsbilled_minutes_week(self-hosted jobs count 0), the table a Billed min/week column, and
comparea billed row and total. - New rule short hosted jobs bill a whole minute: hosted workflows whose billed minutes are at
least twice their job-minutes, by 3...
ci-wizard 0.1.2
Precision:
- Weekly figures no longer read high for a quiet repository: when the window holds every run, it
covers the days asked for, not the span from the oldest run to now (which turned 10 runs on the
last of seven days into 70 a week). Only a window cut short by the 500-run cap scales from its
oldest run, and the report says when that happened (window_truncatedin the JSON).compare
warns when one side is a report from 0.1.1 or earlier. yarn test,yarn lintand other yarn scripts are work, not dependency installs; onlyyarn,
yarn installandyarn --frozen-lockfile-style lines count as installs.- A step that only mentions checkout (
Run checkout e2e tests) is work; checkout means
actions/checkoutor a step named "Checkout" / "Check out". - Step names with expressions (
Test on ${{ matrix.node }}) are matched to their command, so a
matrix job's install steps are classified by what they run. - Runs whose jobs were all skipped no longer count toward job-minutes (
skipped_weekin the JSON). - GitHub-hosted is read from the job's runner group; a self-hosted runner with an
ubuntu-*label
no longer counts as hosted (which hid its wrap-up tail). - A workflow timed from fewer than 3 successful runs is marked † in the table and its findings say
so (thin_samplein the JSON).
Ease of use and process:
- The repository can be a GitHub URL or an SSH remote, or left out inside a checkout whose origin
is on GitHub. --save file.jsonkeeps the JSON report while printing the markdown, as the baseline for
compare; the CLI then says the command to run after the change.- The report opens with a one-line summary (findings, their estimated total against the measured
job-minutes) and ends with the next step: how to prove a fix withcompare. - With no token, the CLI warns about GitHub's anonymous limit, and a not-found repository says
that only public ones can be read without one. - Progress on a terminal while runs and jobs are read; the usage lists every option.
ci-wizard 0.1.1
compare
(before/after reports), facts read from the parsed workflow file, fixes for table escaping and a
missing repository. See CHANGELOG.md.