BSIP77: Require Higher CR When Creating/Adjusting Debt Positions

[abitmore]

PR for #161.

[bitcrab]

if no more change required, possible to merge this ASAP?

[sschiessl-bcp]

I am wondering if this might need to be reconsidered?

Note: logic around *target collateral ratio* (TCR) is not affected.

Current BSIP only affects initial positions. It is to be expected that positions live longer such that replenishing CR through margin call would happen more often as compared to creating a new position. Essentially, my suggestion is to also enforce ICR as minimum value for TCR (no new parameter). Could have a boolean flag to switch this on if owner desires it.

It was discussed here but not till the end I believe.

[abitmore]

Current BSIP only affects initial positions.

No, it affects updating of existing positions as well.

[sschiessl-bcp]

Current BSIP only affects initial positions.

No, it affects updating of existing positions as well.

Yes, of course. I think automatic mechanism of the platform should also honor the asset owner desired buffer.

[bitcrab]

I am wondering if this might need to be reconsidered?

Note: logic around *target collateral ratio* (TCR) is not affected.

Current BSIP only affects initial positions. It is to be expected that positions live longer such that replenishing CR through margin call would happen more often as compared to creating a new position. Essentially, my suggestion is to also enforce ICR as minimum value for TCR (no new parameter). Could have a boolean flag to switch this on if owner desires it.

It was discussed here but not till the end I believe.

in my view it is good to limit TCR>=ICR, although it is not a must.

[sschiessl-bcp]

Accepted

[sschiessl-bcp]

Merge at your convenience