Skip to content

Conversation

sahakiann
Copy link
Collaborator

@sahakiann sahakiann commented Jul 23, 2025

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.86%. Comparing base (81a5d8f) to head (2ab7a46).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #69      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.66%   79.86%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        1938     1957      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         1544     1563      +19     
  Misses        394      394              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 79.86% <100.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sahakiann sahakiann requested a review from snovod July 23, 2025 17:17
@sahakiann sahakiann merged commit 323beb9 into main Jul 23, 2025
8 checks passed
@sahakiann sahakiann deleted the ns_pod-2832_intepret_data_types_correctly branch July 23, 2025 17:23
if all(isinstance(row_value, int) for row_value in non_nan_numbers):
return self.PYTHON_TDR_DATA_TYPE_MAPPING[int]
# If all values are float, return float type
elif all(isinstance(row_value, float) for row_value in non_nan_numbers):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this evaluation necessary if the default for non-all-integer is float either way?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah good point, it's not necessary

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants