Skip to content

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Oct 12, 2017

Version 0.9.0 of nodeshift was just published.

Dependency nodeshift
Current Version 0.8.1
Type devDependency

The version 0.9.0 is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

It might be worth looking into these changes and trying to get this project onto the latest version of nodeshift.

If you have a solid test suite and good coverage, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes directly by merging the proposed change into your project. If the build fails or you don’t have such unconditional trust in your tests, this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Commits

The new version differs by 3 commits.

  • d74235e 0.9.0
  • dbaa5f8 Add the ability to pass in a key=value pair with the -d option.
  • 504a045 update travis to notify #bucharest-gold

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 93.333% when pulling 482628a on greenkeeper/nodeshift-0.9.0 into 1bb7ae0 on master.

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2017
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Oct 18, 2017

Version 0.10.0 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

Commits

The new version differs by 2 commits.

  • 5e55af2 0.10.0
  • 0d6c8cc fix: Template parameters should be inline with the openshift templates.

See the full diff

@ghost ghost removed the in progress label Oct 19, 2017
@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot deleted the greenkeeper/nodeshift-0.9.0 branch October 19, 2017 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants