Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop spikeextractor backend support for NeuralynxRecordingInterface #174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2022

Conversation

h-mayorquin
Copy link
Collaborator

With this PR we drop support for spikextractor backend support for NeuralynxRecordingInterface. The reason for this is that the old backend does not support multi segment extractor. Plus, this should should make #170 way more simple to implement. I still need to add tests for multi segment neuralynx data but this is a simplifying step into that direction.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #174 (f824a6c) into main (d4ab68d) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #174      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.53%   91.49%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          65       65              
  Lines        3391     3375      -16     
==========================================
- Hits         3104     3088      -16     
  Misses        287      287              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.49% <100.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rfaces/ecephys/neuralynx/neuralynxdatainterface.py 96.29% <100.00%> (-0.85%) ⬇️

@h-mayorquin h-mayorquin marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2022 11:43
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD merged commit 8c1c71f into main Oct 12, 2022
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD deleted the remove_old_backend_from_neuralynx branch October 12, 2022 11:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants