-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New features for version 1.0.0 #7
Comments
More features I want for this version:
Until the 1.0.0 release, I'll add features here rather than creating new issues. |
This looks like a huge (good) step forward. I am looking so forward to it. Though I have some more suggestions (should not be in first priority):
And that is about it. Ended up being way larger than I thought. ughman edit: added issue id refs for each bullet point |
Those all look good, except for the text string viewer, not sure what you mean there. If you mean editing text like NEW GAME and such, that would be part of the GOOL thing since those are in those entries. No idea what you mean by variables and switches though. |
Ah so they are in the code entries? Cool that saves me off some work. :) Also the switches are the things like MONO and STEREO and VIBRATION ON and VIBRATION OFF. The variables are like the number of crystals. They seem to be mostly %'s and something else, I will try to fiddle around with these when I can. |
Some more features I want in:
Some more features but probably post-1.0.0:
|
How do those zone-music associations work anyway? Is the target music entry/SEQ specified inside the zone entries (maybe in one of the first two items) or is it somewhere else? |
Yeah the entry ID is one of the values in the first item. |
Also how about exporting entries too? (The format should be the same format as the entry) Currently the best you can do is unprocess entries and export their items and then replace them, wich takes a tedious amount of time. |
Oh yeah that's a good one too
|
And something I forgot in my last post (GitHub mobile wont allow editing) was a Reverse Path option for objects, it simply swaps the first position with the last, second with the second-to-last, etc. This could be particularly useful for duplicating moving enemies or platforms. How would the autoregenerating drawlists work with multiple-position objects though? Will it also count the other positions? That is like, the best feature this could give as it would cause freezings/crashes to disappear (or be much less common) and also fixing weird drawing bugs when modding! ughman edit:
|
Yeah that's good, here's another:
As for drawlist regeneration, using all of the positions instead of just one shouldn't be much harder. The hard part is actually figuring out how the camera knows where it is and where it's facing as well as making an algorithm that can figure out if an object has any positions within that viewing area or not. This is going to involve some 3d math which I'm not good at, so that's a challenge that lies ahead. |
I see. But another fear of mine is that it could mess up some of the drawing in Crash 3, take Tomb Time for example: near the end of the level where the purple gem path reconnects, if you slowly start backtracking the stuff will disappear while still perfectly visible. When regenerated the drawing should be fixed, but it could make the game crash due to too many stuff being on the screen at the time (no guarantee though, my modding capabilities on this game are limited due to the scaling issue and the different scenery). |
Oh and 1 thing that bothers me when I test my modding is the depth of the objects. Is it specified anywhere? It could be extremely useful (but probably extremely complicated) to like, hide crates behind a platform or put nitros under the floor to troll the player in 3D sections (hey this seems like a good idea actually), because if you do this without editing depth, the crates will look like they are above the platform. |
Here are some I came up with:
Also can you post a screenshot of the current GUI (or a mockup of it)? Just to see if there is something I can suggest (also helps me organizing my ideas a bit more). ughman edit: added issue id refs for each bullet point |
Oh cool. I like the color coding right there. Also I noticed a CrashEdit tab, does it have like general settings? Anyway it looks good. |
Been thinking a bit, and I thought of some stuff that could be useful:
Edit: Is it possible to force a "textured scenery" view (shows the scenery exactly like if it was in the game)? That could come in handy in Bee levels because when you see the scenery it is all grey/white and indistinguishable (except for the warp in/out parts). ughman edit: added issue id refs for each bullet point |
I feel this could be used for some fast, easier, and quick edits:
|
Actually, I think condensing all of the issues into just this one has overcomplicated things for me, I'm going to split them all out into separate issues. Even though that's the exact opposite of what I did at the start, heh. |
Any updates? |
Pretty much not really. I'm legitimately considering starting up a new branch and rewriting from scratch in C. If I were to do this, I would specifically target features not already in CrashEdit so I'm not just wasting time redoing the same stuff over (crash 1 zones sound like a good start, instantly makes the program useful). There are upsides and downsides to this:
Point number 6 isn't actually as bad as it seems. A lot of stuff in CrashEdit already needs to be rewritten to be undo/redoable. Point 9 could be eased by integrating a scripting language of some kind, especially if undo/redo support was implicit and automatic. Another point, though, is that I'm currently more interested in an approach like this than the current system. Every time I open the C# crashedit project I feel like closing it and doing something else. Since I'm pretty much the one main developer, that means nothing happens. That said, if someone else wants to take over the C# project, I'm perfectly willing to commit and push all of my private changes, which are a mismash of random broken features, as well as provide any information online whenever. Just don't be surprised to see there's no big undo/redo action system in there. |
I could use that (I even have fully functional Crash 1 entity and camera editors programmed right in so that ain't a problem to me). |
Ignore that C project comment, decided to stick with CrashEdit instead. I've added references to the relevant issues to all of the bullet points here. I've put in "(?)" for the ones I couldn't find issues for. Will close this as duplicate once all of them are posted. |
Not really sure where to post anything, so here it goes.
I've had a fair amount of work done on CrashEdit locally which hasn't been pushed (apparently the version on here is from december of last year? ancient).
I intend to release 1.0.0 at some point, I think this versioning scheme is much better than what I was doing before. I'll probably make a small post on xentax once it's out, but then I'll switch to hpzr.proboards.com to start a thread and announce any further work there. There are certain features I want in before I publish 1.0.0:
Some other things I want but probably won't make it into this version:
This doesn't mean 1.0.0 is coming soon, but it is something I intend to happen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: