Skip to content

Conversation

seancorfield
Copy link
Member

It has been marked Stable for a long time and has had no releases in well over four years, so Inactive is more accurate.

I also want to "encourage" folks to choose next.jdbc instead of java.jdbc at this point, and the README has labeled java.jdbc as "Inactive" and recommended next.jdbc for some time.

  • Have you read the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you signed the Clojure Contributor Agreement?
  • Have you verified your asciidoc markup is correct?

It has been marked Stable for a long time and has had no releases in well over four years, so Inactive is more accurate.

I also want to "encourage" folks to choose `next.jdbc` instead of `java.jdbc` at this point, and the README has labeled `java.jdbc` as "Inactive" and recommended `next.jdbc` for some time.
@puredanger puredanger merged commit 97b6d47 into clojure:master Aug 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants