-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding muon MVA ID #36179
Adding muon MVA ID #36179
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36179/26748
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36179/26749
|
A new Pull Request was created by @andrea21z for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
enable profiling |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
|
Looks like the test failures are relevant - please check for the products you are consuming. The model is very large, 1000 trees and depth 10, 50MB binary weight file. In case the profiling will report a prohibitive memory or CPU consumption, can you investigate ways to prune the model? Did you check if a simple feedforward DNN was competitive? |
thank you! |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Did this PR cause the CMSSW_12_3_X_2022-02-15-1100 build failure
(only PR touching any muon DataFormats in that or preceding IB, i.e. since the last full build) At this time it is not clear to me what exactly is going on there. |
Hmh, I see in the build log of the PR tests |
It was run
but I also see root errors like
|
Thanks @smuzaffar, I was searching the wrong string. The error is actually already in there
but the compilation didn't report a failure. |
I made a fix in #36972 |
ah rigth @makortel error is there but scram did not fail. I am checking why it did not fail for PR tests |
The issue here is understood now. The happens when one has more than one |
Thanks @smuzaffar! |
PR description:
This PR includes the implementation of a new muon identification approach using a MVA:
PR validation: