-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix pat::Muon checksum #36972
Fix pat::Muon checksum #36972
Conversation
type bug-fix |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36972/28340
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test since in the original PR the test didn't catch this, I'm wondering what the test will show here |
isnt there a way to test the full IB setup? |
urgent |
test parameters:
|
There is, but I guess it wouldn't "catch" it either. The error is in the build log of the original PR, it just didn't propagate for some reason to the test status |
Naively looking at the error message: shouldn't class version be increased to 30? |
In principle yes, but in this specific case we can reuse 29 because we have not produced any data with version 29 (and the original PR should have used this value for 29). If we were fixing the class version e.g. a week from now, I would have increased the class version, but now we're talking about fixing it for the IB following the one that introduced 29. |
failure here are not related to this change. PR tests are using a working |
test parameters: |
please test |
+1
|
merge |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2737d8/22442/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+1 |
Pull request #36972 was updated. @simonepigazzini, @vlimant can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2737d8/34792/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
PR description:
Should fix the build failure discussed in #36179 (comment).
PR validation:
None, edited online.