Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rosetta-sdk-go@v0.6.3 #16

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 2, 2020
Merged

Conversation

patrick-ogrady
Copy link
Contributor

@patrick-ogrady patrick-ogrady commented Dec 2, 2020

This PR updates rosetta-ethereum to use the latest rosetta-sdk-go release.

Changes

  • update to latest rosetta-sdk-go release
  • update version (from 0.0.2 to 0.0.3)

rosetta-sdk-go Changes

  • [storage] Block Pruning Optimization #261
  • [asserter] Backwards Compatibility for Operation.Status #260
  • [chore] Miscellaneous Nits Before Release #259
  • Bump github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5 from 5.0.0 to 5.1.0 #256
  • [reconciler] Performance Overhaul #258
  • feat: support schnorr_1 for zilliqa #257
  • [storage] Small Nits #255
  • [storage] Balance Storage Overhaul #252
  • [storage] Interface Refactor + Test Cleanup #254
  • [storage] Interface Overhaul #251
  • [statefulsyncer] Add Variadic Initializer #250
  • [utils] Implement ShardedMap #248
  • [utils] Add MutexMap #246
  • [utils] Implement PriorityMutex #244
  • [chore] Update msgpack #245

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 186

  • 0 of 2 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 73.382%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
ethereum/bootstrap.go 0 2 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 171: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1213
Relevant Lines: 1653

💛 - Coveralls

@patrick-ogrady patrick-ogrady merged commit bc8122d into master Dec 2, 2020
@patrick-ogrady patrick-ogrady deleted the patrick/rosetta-sdk-go-v0.6.3 branch December 2, 2020 17:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants