Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: change the behavior of offline mode correctly #15123

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 23, 2023

Conversation

tkxkd0159
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Closes: #15109

Change to work only when FlagAccountNumber and FlagSequence are in offline mode. In other cases, use AccountRetriever to populate those values.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

Copy link
Contributor

@likhita-809 likhita-809 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes lgtm, thanks for the quick fix

Copy link
Contributor

@atheeshp atheeshp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think changelog has to be updated.

x/staking/client/cli/tx.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@tkxkd0159 tkxkd0159 requested review from atheeshp and removed request for julienrbrt February 22, 2023 07:08
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes lgtm, thank you!

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. TODO:backport-v0.47.1 labels Feb 23, 2023
@mergify mergify bot merged commit c71d199 into cosmos:main Feb 23, 2023
@tkxkd0159 tkxkd0159 deleted the fix-offline-mode branch March 2, 2023 09:25
@tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

@Mergifyio backport release/v0.47.x

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 20, 2023

backport release/v0.47.x

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
## Description
Closes: #15109

Change to work only when `FlagAccountNumber` and `FlagSequence` are in offline mode. In other cases, use `AccountRetriever` to populate those values.

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

(cherry picked from commit c71d199)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	tests/e2e/tx/service_test.go
#	x/staking/client/cli/tx.go
julienrbrt added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
…15478)

Co-authored-by: Jayden Lee <41176085+tkxkd0159@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr>
julienrbrt added a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. C:CLI C:x/auth C:x/genutil genutil module issues C:x/staking
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The offline flag does not work as described.
5 participants