Skip to content

Conversation

knatten
Copy link
Contributor

@knatten knatten commented Oct 4, 2024

The term "basic type" is used twice in this note but it's never defined anywhere. It's not used anywhere else either.


A similar fix was done in #6012, so I was thinking we could do the same here. Alternatively, we could use "arithmetic types" instead of "fundamental types".

The term "basic type" is used twice in this note but it's never defined
anywhere. It's not used anywhere else either.
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 47da0e8 into cplusplus:main Oct 16, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants