Skip to content

[over.oper.general]: Avoid use of the term "basic type" #7287

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

[over.oper.general]: Avoid use of the term "basic type" #7287

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions source/overloading.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3380,14 +3380,14 @@
\pnum
\indextext{operator}%
\begin{note}
The identities among certain predefined operators applied to basic types
The identities among certain predefined operators applied to fundamental types
(for example,
\tcode{++a} $\equiv$
\tcode{a+=1})
need not hold for operator functions.
Some predefined operators, such as
\tcode{+=},
require an operand to be an lvalue when applied to basic types;
require an operand to be an lvalue when applied to fundamental types;
this is not required by operator functions.
\end{note}

Expand Down
Loading