v0.9.927

[0.9.927] - 2026-03-28

📦 ace-handbook v0.23.0

Added

• ace-handbook v0.20.0: Added bin/ace-rubygems-needs-release for single-fetch pending RubyGems release discovery and updated the RubyGems publish workflow/skill to prefer it with corrected exact-name fallback checks.

Changed

• ace-handbook v0.21.0: Migrated most as-release-rubygems-publish release decision logic into the RubyGems publish workflow and kept the skill as a thin wrapper.

Technical

• ace-handbook v0.23.0: Reworked the asciinema executor to drive the recorded PTY directly and expanded recorder/executor/verifier coverage for the interactive YAML path.

📦 ace-review v0.51.0

Fixed

• ace-review v0.50.3: Corrected non-runnable review/package search/lint command examples for hyphen-led flag patterns and Ruby-file lint targeting.
• ace-review v0.50.2: Replaced non-working glob-style ace-search inventory/help-text commands in review/package with executable path-scoped queries.
• ace-review v0.50.1: Corrected invalid workflow command examples in review/package, including unsupported bundle preset usage, path-incompatible ace-search targets, and hyphen-pattern argument parsing.

Added

• ace-review v0.51.0: Standardized package review output handling with deterministic .ace-local/review/package/ report persistence and optional ace-idea attachment flow in review/package.

Changed

• ace-review v0.50.3: Standardized quick-reference search snippets and clarified review workflow guidance around reference shell blocks, evidence reuse, and docs-scan scope.
• ace-review v0.50.2: Made package input validation fail-fast and refined maintainability checks to remove duplicate lint passes and label duplication checks as heuristic.
• ace-review v0.50.1: Refined package-review maintainability and documentation-drift checks to use executable ace-* workflows with clearer, lower-noise evidence gathering.
• ace-review v0.50.0: Expanded the package review workflow into an evidence-first process with deterministic maintainability checks, interface quality evaluation criteria, documentation fidelity cross-checks, and standardized findings tables.