mm/ksm: get mm_slot by mm_slot_entry() when slot is !NULL

Patch series "mm_slot: fix the usage of mm_slot_entry", v2.

When using mm_slot in ksm, there is code like:

     slot = mm_slot_lookup(mm_slots_hash, mm);
     mm_slot = mm_slot_entry(slot, struct ksm_mm_slot, slot);
     if (mm_slot && ..) {
     }

The mm_slot_entry() won't return a valid value if slot is NULL generally. 
But currently it works since slot is the first element of struct
ksm_mm_slot.

To reduce the ambiguity and make it robust, access mm_slot_entry() when
slot is !NULL.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250919071244.17020-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250919071244.17020-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Author: RichardWeiYang

mm/ksm.c

@@ -2936,15 +2936,17 @@ void __ksm_exit(struct mm_struct *mm)
 
 	spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
 	slot = mm_slot_lookup(mm_slots_hash, mm);
-	mm_slot = mm_slot_entry(slot, struct ksm_mm_slot, slot);
-	if (mm_slot && ksm_scan.mm_slot != mm_slot) {
-		if (!mm_slot->rmap_list) {
-			hash_del(&slot->hash);
-			list_del(&slot->mm_node);
-			easy_to_free = 1;
-		} else {
-			list_move(&slot->mm_node,
-				  &ksm_scan.mm_slot->slot.mm_node);
+	if (slot) {
+		mm_slot = mm_slot_entry(slot, struct ksm_mm_slot, slot);
+		if (ksm_scan.mm_slot != mm_slot) {
+			if (!mm_slot->rmap_list) {
+				hash_del(&slot->hash);
+				list_del(&slot->mm_node);
+				easy_to_free = 1;
+			} else {
+				list_move(&slot->mm_node,
+					  &ksm_scan.mm_slot->slot.mm_node);
+			}
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);