Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Perfomance testing of EOS #3

Closed
cyborgshead opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Perfomance testing of EOS #3

cyborgshead opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@cyborgshead
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@cyborgshead cyborgshead added this to the Sprint 8 milestone Apr 10, 2018
@cyborgshead cyborgshead self-assigned this Apr 10, 2018
@mastercyb mastercyb self-assigned this Apr 10, 2018
@cyborgshead cyborgshead removed this from the Sprint 8 milestone Apr 10, 2018
@cyberadmin cyberadmin changed the title Research on EOS testnet Perfomance testing of EOS Apr 24, 2018
@cyborgshead cyborgshead added this to the Sprint 11 milestone May 21, 2018
@asadovka asadovka modified the milestones: Sprint 11, Sprint 12 Jun 1, 2018
@cyberadmin cyberadmin modified the milestones: Sprint 12, Sprint 13 Jun 4, 2018
@asadovka asadovka removed this from the Sprint 13 milestone Jun 15, 2018
@mastercyb
Copy link
Member

mastercyb commented Aug 23, 2018

Its obvious that current performance of EOS is far from what we need in order to fill an index in couple of months with (1) all transactions from chains, (2) content from IPFS and Swarm and content from legacy sources such as Arxiv, Wiki, Github and Bittorent. Also a way more performant solutions such as Solana already very close to productive network. We dont need to do that

SaveTheAles added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 19, 2019
faddat pushed a commit to faddat/go-cyber that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2023
faddat added a commit to faddat/go-cyber that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants