Skip to content

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

When collecting all functions from the symbol table (code-typed symbols), we must not include typedefs (which may also be code typed).

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

When collecting all functions from the symbol table (code-typed
symbols), we must not include typedefs (which may also be code typed).
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.02%. Comparing base (b335979) to head (6a37de3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #8403   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    78.02%   78.02%           
========================================
  Files         1726     1726           
  Lines       189442   189442           
  Branches     18466    18466           
========================================
  Hits        147808   147808           
  Misses       41634    41634           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@feliperodri feliperodri merged commit 5ef19c8 into diffblue:develop Aug 6, 2024
40 checks passed
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the fix-dfcc-typedef branch August 6, 2024 17:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants