-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 477
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed a (presumed) typo in documentation in matrix_view.rs #1385
Conversation
Fixed a (presumed) typo in documentation in matrix_view.rs. Previously it says fixed_view and fixed_slice returns a matrix with `(R::dim(), CView::dim())` consecutive components. I just changed R to RView, because presumably this is a typo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! It looks like the docs you're updating affect functions with RVIEW
/CVIEW
const generic parameters, not RView
/CView
type parameters.
sorry, so should they all say |
That makes sense to me, at least! |
Fixed a (presumed) typo in documentation in matrix_view.rs. Previously it says fixed_view and fixed_slice returns a matrix with `(RView, CView)` consecutive components. As per-input, and after re-reading the documentation and source code. Seems like RView and CView should be used instead of RView::dim() and CViem::dim().
with this pull request I changed the documentation for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Fixed spacing in documentation.
Fixed a (presumed) typo in documentation in matrix_view.rs.
Previously it says fixed_view and fixed_slice returns a matrix with
(R::dim(), CView::dim())
consecutive components. I just changed R to RView, because presumably this is a typo.This is my first time submitting a pull request, and I would be more than happy to take any input.