Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Making gdbn an extra require #337

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 5, 2019

Conversation

vsoch
Copy link
Contributor

@vsoch vsoch commented Nov 1, 2019

This is a suggested fix for #335 - we just make gdbn an extra require so the core package can be installed without it.

Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat vsochat@stanford.edu

Signed-off-by: Vanessa Sochat <vsochat@stanford.edu>
@nick-youngblut
Copy link

Thanks for creating this PR! It would be really nice to get nolearn on conda-forge without the gdbn req, which has been a pain. It seems that there's a simple error in the setup.py, which is causing the builds to fail

@vsoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

vsoch commented Nov 3, 2019

I don’t know about any setup.py dev - should that work? I don’t think I changed anything that would change that original test.

@nick-youngblut
Copy link

Actually, you might want to try just re-running the builds.

@vsoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

vsoch commented Nov 3, 2019

okay just updated with master and new push.

@vsoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

vsoch commented Nov 3, 2019

All green! 🍏 💚

@nick-youngblut
Copy link

Great! Once the updates are on pypi, I'll create the conda-forge recipe

@vsoch
Copy link
Contributor Author

vsoch commented Nov 4, 2019

@dnouri let us know if any additional changes are needed.

@dnouri dnouri merged commit 657d757 into dnouri:master Nov 5, 2019
@dnouri
Copy link
Owner

dnouri commented Nov 5, 2019

Thanks for your work

@vsoch vsoch deleted the update/make-gdbn-extra branch November 5, 2019 10:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants