Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for missing documentation of .NET6 CAxxxx rules #23900

Closed
12 of 22 tasks
Youssef1313 opened this issue Apr 23, 2021 · 12 comments · Fixed by #27885
Closed
12 of 22 tasks

Tracking issue for missing documentation of .NET6 CAxxxx rules #23900

Youssef1313 opened this issue Apr 23, 2021 · 12 comments · Fixed by #27885
Assignees
Labels
doc-idea Indicates issues that are suggestions for new topics [org][type][category] Pri2

Comments

@Youssef1313
Copy link
Member

Youssef1313 commented Apr 23, 2021

TODO

Done

See https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn-analyzers/blob/main/src/NetAnalyzers/RulesMissingDocumentation.md.

CAxxxx docs guide.

Tagging @buyaa-n @stephentoub @ryzngard @jkoritzinsky @NewellClark @MeikTranel who implemented these in case any of you wants to open a docs PR.

@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot added the ⌚ Not Triaged Not triaged label Apr 23, 2021
@gewarren gewarren added doc-idea Indicates issues that are suggestions for new topics [org][type][category] Pri2 and removed Pri3 ⌚ Not Triaged Not triaged labels Apr 23, 2021
@mavasani
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you so much for creating this doc isssue @Youssef1313! You are always one step ahead of us :-)

@mavasani
Copy link
Contributor

Also tagging @jeffhandley as an FYI

@mavasani mavasani changed the title Tracking issue for missing documentation of CAxxxx rules Tracking issue for missing documentation of .NET6 CAxxxx rules May 18, 2021
This was referenced May 21, 2021
@NewellClark NewellClark mentioned this issue May 31, 2021
@jeffhandley
Copy link
Member

Adding @buyaa-n and @carlossanlop for their tracking.

@MeikTranel
Copy link
Contributor

MeikTranel commented Jun 14, 2021

@Youssef1313 can you add #23377 to the CA1847 Rule point? I've reopened the PR a while ago.

@mikeKuester
Copy link

Visual Studio 2022 shows CA2254 warnings, but the link is broken? It is also missing in https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/
But if I look in the issue, it should be already merged? "CA2254 added in Enabled logging analyzer on new repo roslyn-analyzers#5244."

@Youssef1313
Copy link
Member Author

@mikeKuester The PR that's merged is that product PR. The docs PR isn't yet created. cc @maryamariyan

@mikeKuester
Copy link

mikeKuester commented Dec 7, 2021

@Youssef1313 Ok, it is a little bit strange, that a new analyser is deployed without an explanation. :(
At least from my user perspective.

@pcartwright81
Copy link

@Youssef1313 Ok, it is a little bit strange, that a new analyser is deployed without an explanation. :( At least from my user perspective.

Is this analyser live in main or or preview?

@Eli-Black-Work
Copy link

It's been live in non-preview VS2022 for a while 🙂

@mikeKuester
Copy link

mikeKuester commented Jan 17, 2022

I didn't install the VS2022 preview, so it's live since the first stable VS2022 version. (actual 17.0.5)

@Youssef1313
Copy link
Member Author

The issue is probably near to be fixed. See #27885

@Eli-Black-Work
Copy link

Yay! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc-idea Indicates issues that are suggestions for new topics [org][type][category] Pri2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.