clarify how type can declare new static members #29642
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes dotnet#29471 When a type declares a static member with the same signature as an interface it implements, it's not an override. Nor does it hide the method. Instead, it's a unique method declared in a different type.
gewarren
approved these changes
May 26, 2022
baronfel
pushed a commit
to baronfel/dotnet-docs
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2022
* clarify how type can declare new static members Fixes dotnet#29471 When a type declares a static member with the same signature as an interface it implements, it's not an override. Nor does it hide the method. Instead, it's a unique method declared in a different type. * Move static description to a note.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #29471
When a type declares a static member with the same signature as an interface it implements, it's not an override. Nor does it hide the method. Instead, it's a unique method declared in a different type.