Add fixed example for CA rule

docs/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1708.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 title: "CA1708: Identifiers should differ by more than case (code analysis)"
 description: "Learn about code analysis rule CA1708: Identifiers should differ by more than case"
-ms.date: 03/11/2019
+ms.date: 12/08/2022
 ms.topic: reference
 f1_keywords:
   - "IdentifiersShouldDifferByMoreThanCase"
@@ -14,11 +14,11 @@ ms.author: gewarren
 ---
 # CA1708: Identifiers should differ by more than case
 
-| | Value |
-|-|-|
-| **Rule ID** |CA1708|
-| **Category** |[Naming](naming-warnings.md)|
-| **Fix is breaking or non-breaking** |Breaking|
+|                                     | Value                        |
+| ----------------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
+| **Rule ID**                         | CA1708                       |
+| **Category**                        | [Naming](naming-warnings.md) |
+| **Fix is breaking or non-breaking** | Breaking                     |
 
 ## Cause
 
@@ -30,11 +30,9 @@ By default, this rule only looks at externally visible types, members, and names
 
 Identifiers for namespaces, types, members, and parameters cannot differ only by case because languages that target the common language runtime are not required to be case-sensitive. For example, Visual Basic is a widely used case-insensitive language.
 
-This rule fires on publicly visible members only.
-
 ## How to fix violations
 
-Select a name that is unique when it is compared to other identifiers in a case-insensitive manner.
+Select a name that's unique when it's compared to other identifiers in a case-insensitive manner.
 
 ## When to suppress warnings
 
@@ -54,4 +52,20 @@ You can configure this option for just this rule, for all rules, or for all rule
 
 The following example demonstrates a violation of this rule.
 
-:::code language="csharp" source="snippets/csharp/all-rules/ca1708.cs" id="snippet1":::
+```csharp
+public class Class1
+{
+    protected string someName;
+    public string SomeName => someName;
+}
+```
+
+The following example shows one way to fix the violation
+
+```csharp
+public class Class1
+{
+    protected string _someName;
+    public string SomeName => _someName;
+}
+```