Fix more broken links

docs/azure/sdk/resource-management.md

@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ using Azure.ResourceManager.ServiceBus;
 
 ArmClient client = new ArmClient(new DefaultAzureCredential());
 SubscriptionResource subscription = client.GetDefaultSubscription();
-ResourceGroupResource resourceGroup = 
+ResourceGroupResource resourceGroup =
     client.GetDefaultSubscription().GetResourceGroup(resourceGroupName);
 ```
 
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ ArmClient client = new ArmClient(new DefaultAzureCredential());
 // Next we get a resource group object
 // ResourceGroup is a {ResourceName}Resource object from above
 SubscriptionResource subscription = await client.GetDefaultSubscriptionAsync();
-ResourceGroupResource resourceGroup = 
+ResourceGroupResource resourceGroup =
     await subscription.GetResourceGroupAsync("myRgName");
 
 // Next we get the collection for the virtual machines
@@ -199,16 +199,16 @@ However, keep in mind that some of those properties could be null. You can usual
 You may not want to manually create the `resourceId` from a pure `string`. Each `{ResourceName}Resource` class has a static method that can help you create the resource identifier string.
 
 ```csharp
-ResourceIdentifier resourceId = 
+ResourceIdentifier resourceId =
     AvailabilitySetResource.CreateResourceIdentifier(
         "aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee",
-        "resourceGroupName", 
-        "resourceName"); 
+        "resourceGroupName",
+        "resourceName");
 ```
 
 #### Manage existing resources
 
-Performing operations on resources that already exist is a common use case when using the management client libraries. In this scenario, you usually have the identifier of the resource you want to work on as a string. Although the new object hierarchy is great for provisioning and working within the scope of a given parent, it is not the most efficient when it comes to this specific scenario.  
+Performing operations on resources that already exist is a common use case when using the management client libraries. In this scenario, you usually have the identifier of the resource you want to work on as a string. Although the new object hierarchy is great for provisioning and working within the scope of a given parent, it is not the most efficient when it comes to this specific scenario.
 
 Here's an example how you can access an `AvailabilitySetResource` object and manage it directly with its resource identifier:
 
@@ -247,11 +247,11 @@ This approach required a lot of code and three API calls are made to Azure. The
 So, the previous example would end up looking like this:
 
 ```csharp
-ResourceIdentifier resourceId = 
+ResourceIdentifier resourceId =
     AvailabilitySetResource.CreateResourceIdentifier(
         "aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee",
         "resourceGroupName",
-        "resourceName"); 
+        "resourceName");
 // We construct a new armClient to work with
 ArmClient client = new ArmClient(new DefaultAzureCredential());
 // Next we get the AvailabilitySet resource client from the armClient
@@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ For more detailed examples, take a look at [samples](https://github.com/Azure/az
 
 ### More sample code
 
-- [Managing Resource Groups](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/blob/main/sdk/resourcemanager/Azure.ResourceManager/samples/Sample2_ManagingResourceGroups.md)
-- [Creating a Virtual Network](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/blob/main/sdk/resourcemanager/Azure.ResourceManager/samples/Sample3_CreatingAVirtualNetwork.md)
+- [Managing Resource Groups](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/blob/main/sdk/resourcemanager/Azure.ResourceManager/samples/DocSamples/Sample2_ManagingResourceGroups.cs)
+- [Creating a Virtual Network](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-net/blob/main/sdk/resourcemanager/Azure.ResourceManager/samples/DocSamples/Sample3_CreatingAVirtualNetwork.cs)
 - [.NET Management Library Code Samples](/samples/browse/?languages=csharp&terms=managing%20using%20Azure%20.NET%20SDK)
 
 ### Additional Documentation

docs/core/diagnostics/distributed-tracing-instrumentation-walkthroughs.md

@@ -250,10 +250,10 @@ if(activity != null)
 ```
 
 - OpenTelemetry provides a set of recommended
-[conventions](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/trace/semantic_conventions/README.md)
+[conventions](https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/docs/general/trace.md)
 for setting Tags on Activities that represent common types of application work.
 
-- If you are instrumenting functions with high-performance requirements,
+- If you're instrumenting functions with high-performance requirements,
 <xref:System.Diagnostics.Activity.IsAllDataRequested?displayProperty=nameWithType> is a hint that indicates whether any
 of the code listening to Activities intends to read auxiliary information such as Tags. If no listener will read it, then there
 is no need for the instrumented code to spend CPU cycles populating it. For simplicity, this sample doesn't apply that

docs/whats-new/dotnet-docs-mod0.md

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ The following people contributed to the .NET docs during this period. Thank you!
 - [AptiviCEO](https://github.com/AptiviCEO) - Aptivi CEO ![2 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-2-green)
 - [BartoszKlonowski](https://github.com/BartoszKlonowski) - Bartosz Klonowski ![2 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-2-green)
 - [bergerb](https://github.com/bergerb) - Brent ![2 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-2-green)
-- [nitishwebgentle](https://github.com/nitishwebgentle) - Nitish Kumar | Microsoft MVP ![2 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-2-green)
+- nitishwebgentle - Nitish Kumar | Microsoft MVP ![2 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-2-green)
 - [0xced](https://github.com/0xced) - Cédric Luthi ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)
 - [AdrianoAE](https://github.com/AdrianoAE) - AdrianoAE ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)
 - [afscrome](https://github.com/afscrome) - Alex Crome ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)
@@ -116,7 +116,6 @@ The following people contributed to the .NET docs during this period. Thank you!
 - [JimmyCushnie](https://github.com/JimmyCushnie) - Jimmy Cushnie ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)
 - [kblok](https://github.com/kblok) - Darío Kondratiuk ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)
 - [Kiruyuto](https://github.com/Kiruyuto) - Hubert ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)
-- [learn-build-service-prod](https://github.com/learn-build-service-prod) -  ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)
 - [lemonez](https://github.com/lemonez) - Ezra Citron ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)
 - [licon4812](https://github.com/licon4812) - James Alickolli ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)
 - [meziantou](https://github.com/meziantou) - Gérald Barré ![1 pull requests.](https://img.shields.io/badge/Merged%20Pull%20Requests-1-green)