Skip to content

Conversation

TaraOverfield and others added 4 commits September 2, 2025 06:53
…47867)

* [DocsArchive-1.0.25211.1](2025-08-06-18-00-53)Auto archive content

* Fix TOC file

---------

Co-authored-by: Docs.Archive pipeline <docsArchive@microsoft.com>
* update docs

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Genevieve Warren <24882762+gewarren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Noah Falk <noahfalk@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Genevieve Warren <24882762+gewarren@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Noah Falk <noahfalk@users.noreply.github.com>
…sync` instead of `DeserializeAsync` (#48202)

* Use Net.Http.Json extension method GetFromJsonAsync instead of JsonSerializer

* Remove configuring the deserialization

* Capitalize the Name property

* Update Repository class

* Remove unused Text.Json.Serialization

* Correct the orders of points

* WriteLine instead of Write in early phase to improve output readability

* Revert "Correct the orders of points"

This reverts commit bb708ac.

* Remove leftover sentence

* Mention that GetFromJsonAsync is case-insensitive

This is mentioned in two places - with the C# naming convention, where
it's worth to mention why we keep on having uppercase, and in the Repository
class defining, where we would normally had to make a conversion, but
now we don't because we have case-insensitive method as a tool.
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot merged commit 210c668 into live Sep 3, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants