Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0-staging] Transfer ThreadPool local queue to high-pri queue on Task blocking #109989

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Backport of #109841 to release/9.0-staging

/cc @stephentoub

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

This is an experimental fix related #103984. Some 1p services that use a lot of sync-over-async are experiencing stalls due to some priority inversion issues in work items that get queued to the thread pool. In some situations, the services stall for a long time until a large number of worker threads are injected, which can take a long time. This change would help the app continue to make progress. This change (in addition addition to some app-level throttling to stop new items from being added to the request queue) should help with unblocking.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

[If yes, specify when the regression was introduced. Provide the PR or commit if known.]

Testing

n/a. This is experimental to validate in production with the config set.

Risk

Low, the feature is behind a config flag

Added for now under the same config flag as is being used for other work prioritization experimentation.
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @mangod9
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@stephentoub
Copy link
Member

cc: @mangod9

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Nov 20, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. please get a code review. we will take for consideration in 9.0.x

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Nov 21, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added this to the 9.0.1 milestone Nov 25, 2024
@mangod9 mangod9 merged commit d955059 into release/9.0-staging Nov 26, 2024
146 of 151 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-System.Threading Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants