Calculate if we're in an instance method in one place to support reverse IL stubs. #33199
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AaronRobinsonMSFT
approved these changes
Mar 5, 2020
|
Hello @jkoritzinsky! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
ghost
merged commit 
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For reverse stubs, we don't set the calling convention of the stub to the actual calling convention since the JIT doesn't support reading that correctly. As a result, the emit for return values in reverse P/Invokes wasn't correctly detecting that it was a thiscall stub. This PR changes the "are we an instance method" check to live in one place (where we have the knowledge of which calling convention the stub is for).
Contributes to #33129 (fixes the crash, but there's still incorrect behavior from the JIT)