-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: fixed to be compatible with Flutter for Web (#8) #8
Conversation
Thanks for opening this issue! I was torn between doing something as you've done and using Since your code checks that the input I'll approve this PR and merge it. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 54 57 +3
=========================================
+ Hits 54 57 +3
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. 🙏
Hi,
I implemented one solution mentioned in #7. However, I am not a very expert in this field, so perhaps the elimination of the mask operation may cause problem with the standard specifications. Please verify this point.
But at least my assumption was that if we guarantee the value of
value
variable as the maximum number within the allowable range of JavaScript, the mask operation would be unnecessary.