Skip to content

applies_to: Show GA in "Planned" if technical preview exists #1492

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 2, 2025
Merged

applies_to: Show GA in "Planned" if technical preview exists #1492

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 2, 2025

Conversation

reakaleek
Copy link
Member

@reakaleek reakaleek commented Jul 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Context

@florent-leborgne reported that only the word "Planned" isn't clear enough if the preview lifecycle exists. The suggestion was to use "GA planned" if a technical preview lifecycle exists for the same applies_to key.

Preview

```{applies_to}
stack: preview 9.0, ga 9.1
apm_agent_java: ga 9.1
```
image

@reakaleek reakaleek requested a review from a team as a code owner July 1, 2025 20:00
@reakaleek reakaleek self-assigned this Jul 1, 2025
@florent-leborgne
Copy link
Contributor

@reakaleek This is also the case if "Beta" exists, otherwise LGTM :)

@reakaleek
Copy link
Member Author

@reakaleek This is also the case if "Beta" exists, otherwise LGTM :)

38d5cca

florent-leborgne
florent-leborgne approved these changes Jul 2, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@florent-leborgne florent-leborgne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!!

@reakaleek reakaleek merged commit 948f246 into main Jul 2, 2025
16 checks passed
@reakaleek reakaleek deleted the feature/show-ga-when-technical-preview-exists branch July 2, 2025 15:37
@reakaleek reakaleek mentioned this pull request Jul 3, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@cotti cotti cotti approved these changes

@florent-leborgne florent-leborgne florent-leborgne approved these changes

Assignees

@reakaleek reakaleek

Labels

enhancement

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@reakaleek @florent-leborgne @cotti