Skip to content

Deserialize anonymous bucket with only doc_count #4214

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2019
Merged

Deserialize anonymous bucket with only doc_count #4214

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2019

Conversation

russcam
Copy link
Contributor

@russcam russcam commented Nov 12, 2019

This commit deserializes an anonymous bucket that contains only a doc_count. Existing tests cover the case where the bucket has sub-aggregations, but did not handle the case where there are none.

Fixes #4197

This commit deserializes an anonymous bucket that contains only a doc_count. Existing tests cover the case where the bucket has sub-aggregations, but did not handle the case where there are none.

Fixes #4197
@russcam russcam merged commit 780f52f into 7.x Nov 13, 2019
russcam added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2019
This commit deserializes an anonymous bucket that contains only a doc_count. Existing tests cover the case where the bucket has sub-aggregations, but did not handle the case where there are none.

Fixes #4197

(cherry picked from commit 780f52f)
russcam added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2019
This commit deserializes an anonymous bucket that contains only a doc_count. Existing tests cover the case where the bucket has sub-aggregations, but did not handle the case where there are none.

Fixes #4197

(cherry picked from commit 780f52f)
@russcam
Copy link
Contributor Author

russcam commented Nov 13, 2019

ported to 7.4 and master

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz deleted the fix/4197 branch February 10, 2020 10:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants