[Test] Fix SslMultiPortTests by increasing the number of ephemeral ports on Windows #106540
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rts on windows This PR increases client's port ranges for tests which are executed on Windows in order to avoid failures due to some port ranges being excluded from use. The larger ports range (300) is chosen based on the observation where a random consecutive range of 200 ports can be excluded on Windows test workers. Relates to: elastic#103894 Resolves: elastic#106537
slobodanadamovic
added
>test
|
Pinging @elastic/es-security (Team:Security) |
slobodanadamovic
added
the
auto-merge-without-approval
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR increases client's port ranges for tests which are executed on Windows in order to avoid failures due to some port ranges being excluded from use. The larger ports range (300) is chosen based on the observation where a random consecutive range of 200 ports can be excluded on Windows test workers.
Relates to #103894, which fixed similar issues but this one seems to have been missed.
Resolves: #106537