Skip to content

Fix indication to inexistant is_record macro #154

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2013
Merged

Fix indication to inexistant is_record macro #154

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions getting_started/2.markdown
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ In the example above, the second clause will only match when x is positive. The
* arithmetic operators (`+`, `-`, `*`, `/`);
* `<>` and `++` as long as the left side is a literal;
* the `in` operator;
* all the following type check functions:
* all the following type check functions (the number preceded by slash represents number of arguments):

* is_atom/1
* is_binary/1
Expand All @@ -439,8 +439,8 @@ In the example above, the second clause will only match when x is positive. The
* is_number/1
* is_pid/1
* is_port/1
* is_record/1
* is_record/2
* is_record/3
* is_reference/1
* is_tuple/1
* is_exception/1
Expand Down