Fix Elixir module matcher RegEx #856
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hello, @CharlotteDunois! This is your first Pull Request that will be reviewed by Ebert, an automatic Code Review service. It will leave comments on this diff with potential issues and style violations found in the code as you push new commits. You can also see all the issues found on this Pull Request on its review page. Please check our documentation for more information. |
|
Thank you @CharlotteDunois! Could you please also add unit test to autolink_test.exs so we don't have any regressions in the future? |
|
@josevalim Thanks for the heads up! The unit test is added. |
michalmuskala
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2018
|
❤️ 💚 💙 💛 💜 |
ghost
deleted the
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a negative lookbehind for multiline codeblocks, to fix an issue where a module name in an inline codeblock after a multiline codeblock didn't get correctly matched, due to the regex matching from the multiline codeblock to the inline codeblock.
Before: https://regex101.com/r/Du8vUp/1
After: https://regex101.com/r/Zit4pj/1