-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 264
superchainERC20 #986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
superchainERC20 #986
Conversation
cpengilly
commented
Oct 14, 2024
- explainer added to op stack > protocol > interop
- symbolic link added to builders > app devs > contracts
- explainer added to op stack > protocol > interop - symbolic link added to builders > app devs > contracts
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes across multiple files, primarily focused on the addition of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
pages/builders/app-developers/contracts/_meta.json (1)
4-5
: LGTM! Consider minor capitalization adjustment.The addition of the "superchain-erc20" entry is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. The JSON structure remains valid with the correct use of commas.
For consistency with other entries, consider capitalizing "Token Standard" in the value:
- "superchain-erc20": "SuperchainERC20 Token Standard" + "superchain-erc20": "SuperchainERC20 Token standard"words.txt (3)
67-67
: LGTM! Consider adding hyphenated versions.The additions of 'crosschain', 'multichain', 'Predeploy', and 'Predeployed' are relevant and correctly spelled. Their capitalization is consistent with common usage in the blockchain space.
Consider also including hyphenated versions 'cross-chain' and 'multi-chain' as they are commonly used variants.
Also applies to: 208-208, 265-265, 266-266
Line range hint
1-2
: Consider adopting a consistent case convention.The changes from uppercase to lowercase for many terms (e.g., ACCOUNTQUEUE to accountqueue) improve readability. However, there's still a mix of case styles in the file.
To enhance consistency:
- Use lowercase for general terms and concepts (e.g., 'accountqueue', 'blocklogs').
- Maintain uppercase only for well-established acronyms (e.g., 'IPFS', 'RPC').
- Use PascalCase for proper nouns or specific protocol names (e.g., 'Predeploy', 'SuperchainERC20').
Consider reviewing the remaining uppercase words to determine if they should follow this convention.
Also applies to: 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, 17-18, 19-20, 21-22, 23-24, 25-26, 27-28, 29-30, 31-32, 33-34, 35-36, 37-38, 39-40, 41-42, 43-44, 45-46, 47-48, 49-50, 51-52, 53-54, 55-56, 57-58, 59-60, 61-62, 63-64, 65-66
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~69-~69: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...factually crosschain Crossmint daserver DATACAP datacap DATADIR datadir Dencun derviation Devne...(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
Line range hint
1-400
: Consider restructuring the word list for improved maintainability.While the additions and case modifications improve the word list, there are some structural issues that could be addressed to enhance its usability and maintainability.
Consider the following improvements:
- Alphabetically sort the words to make it easier to find and update specific terms.
- Remove duplicates with different cases, keeping only the preferred case for each term.
- Group related terms together (e.g., all forms of 'predeploy' could be adjacent).
- Add comments or sections to categorize words (e.g., "// Blockchain Terms", "// Project-Specific Terms").
These changes would make the file more organized and easier to maintain in the long run.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~69-~69: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...factually crosschain Crossmint daserver DATACAP datacap DATADIR datadir Dencun derviation Devne...(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (5)
19-24
: Minor grammatical correction needed.The Features and benefits section effectively highlights the key advantages of the SuperchainERC20 standard. However, there's a small grammatical issue in the last point.
Please apply the following change to improve readability:
-* **Ethereum-aligned**: Intentionally designed to be supported across the EVM ecosystem (RIP coming soon). +* **Ethereum-aligned**: Intentionally designed for support across the EVM ecosystem (RIP coming soon).🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: The preposition ‘of’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...ins the integrity of the original owner on the contract and preserves security but...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_ON_OF)
26-31
: Minor correction for consistency.The Major components section effectively outlines the key elements of the SuperchainERC20 standard. However, there's a small inconsistency in the capitalization of "create2".
Please apply the following change for consistency:
-* **Factory Predeploy**: uses a `create2`-based factory for deploying `SuperchainERC20` tokens consistently across chains. +* **Factory Predeploy**: uses a `CREATE2`-based factory for deploying `SuperchainERC20` tokens consistently across chains.This change aligns with the capitalization used earlier in the document (line 23).
33-42
: Minor grammatical correction needed.The Comparison to other standards section effectively highlights the unique aspects of SuperchainERC20. However, there's a small grammatical issue in the second point.
Please apply the following change to improve clarity:
-* `SuperchainERC20` shares trust assumptions across all chains in the superchain, such that custom assumptions around security and latency are not required to account for when executing transfers. +* `SuperchainERC20` shares trust assumptions across all chains in the superchain, such that custom assumptions around security and latency are not required when executing transfers.This change removes the redundant phrase "to account for" and improves the sentence flow.
44-55
: Minor grammatical corrections needed.The Implementation details section provides clear instructions for developers. However, there are a couple of small grammatical issues that need attention.
Please apply the following changes to improve clarity and correctness:
- In the first sentence:
-Application developers must complete two tasks to enable `SuperchainERC20`. This advance setup ensures that `SuperchainERC20` goes live when the Interop upgrade happens and tokens becomes interoperable. +Application developers must complete two tasks to enable `SuperchainERC20`. This advance setup ensures that `SuperchainERC20` goes live when the Interop upgrade happens and tokens become interoperable.
- In the note about preserving integrity (line 23):
-Importantly, permissionless propagation retains the integrity of the original owner on the contract and preserves security but proliferates the contract's availability to new chains. +Importantly, permissionless propagation retains the integrity of the original owner of the contract and preserves security but proliferates the contract's availability to new chains.These changes correct subject-verb agreement and improve the clarity of the sentences.
1-61
: Overall: Well-structured and informative document with minor improvements needed.This document provides a comprehensive and well-organized overview of the SuperchainERC20 Token Standard. The content effectively communicates the key aspects of the standard, including its features, components, implementation details, and next steps for developers.
The use of Callout components enhances readability and effectively highlights important information. The document generally adheres to the provided coding guidelines, with a good balance of technical detail and clarity.
To further improve the document:
- Consider adding a brief table of contents at the beginning to help readers navigate the different sections more easily.
- Review the capitalization of technical terms (e.g., "Superchain" vs "superchain") for consistency throughout the document.
- Consider expanding on the "Comparison to other standards" section to provide more concrete examples of how SuperchainERC20 differs from specific existing standards (e.g., ERC20, ERC777).
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions or further refining the document?
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: The preposition ‘of’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...ins the integrity of the original owner on the contract and preserves security but...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_ON_OF)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- pages/builders/app-developers/contracts/_meta.json (1 hunks)
- pages/builders/app-developers/contracts/superchain-erc20.mdx (1 hunks)
- pages/stack/protocol/interop/_meta.json (1 hunks)
- pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1 hunks)
- words.txt (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- pages/builders/app-developers/contracts/superchain-erc20.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1)
Pattern
**/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for headers, buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- Use sentence case for H1, H2, and H3 headers, capitalizing only the first word and any proper nouns.
- For all headers (H1, H2, H3), do not change the capitalization of proper nouns; keep them as they are.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: The preposition ‘of’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...ins the integrity of the original owner on the contract and preserves security but...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_ON_OF)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/_meta.json (1)
4-5
: LGTM! New entry added correctly.The changes look good. The comma addition on line 4 maintains valid JSON syntax, and the new entry for "superchain-erc20" is consistent with the existing format and naming conventions.
Let's verify if there's a corresponding Markdown file for the new entry:
pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (2)
1-17
: LGTM: Well-structured introduction and metadata.The frontmatter, import statement, and introduction are well-structured and provide a clear overview of the SuperchainERC20 token standard. The use of the Callout component effectively highlights the development status.
57-61
: LGTM: Comprehensive next steps and resources.The Next steps section provides valuable resources for further exploration of the SuperchainERC20 standard. The links are well-formatted, and the content is clear and concise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm! although, I think it would be very nice is we can pull the whole Interoperability
section up a level and drop it under Experimental
. Then setup redirect links. I can address this in a different PR, but I think this will help with visibility and help illustrate that this is a developing feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm but two general changes needed before approval:
- Make intro concise, we're also glossing over how amazing interop is. it allows for tokens to make across chains without asset wrapping, middlechains, or liquidity pools for maximal capital efficiency - unifying liquidity and simplifying user experience.
- Clean up some fragments in following sections
@zainbacchus addressed your comments, thank you for the awesome review! |
@CodeRabbit can you generate a mermaid diagram for the 'how it works' section, explaining the minting and burning flow? |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @cpengilly: Sure, here's a Mermaid diagram for the 'How it Works' section explaining the minting and burning flow: sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant SourceChain
participant SuperchainERC20Bridge
participant DestinationChain
User->>SourceChain: Initiate token transfer
SourceChain->>SourceChain: Burn tokens
SourceChain-->>SuperchainERC20Bridge: Emit cross-chain event
SuperchainERC20Bridge-->>DestinationChain: Relay event
DestinationChain->>DestinationChain: Mint tokens
DestinationChain->>User: User receives tokens
This diagram illustrates the process where tokens are burned on the source chain and minted on the destination chain, enabling seamless cross-chain transfers without the need for asset wrapping or liquidity pools. Let me know if you need any adjustments! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (5)
15-15
: Capitalize "Superchain" for consistency.Ensure proper nouns are capitalized consistently throughout the document.
Apply this change:
-`SuperchainERC20` is a token standard designed to enable asset interoperability in the Superchain. +`SuperchainERC20` is a token standard designed to enable asset interoperability in the Superchain.
15-16
: Consider expanding the initial description.The current description is concise but could benefit from additional context to help readers understand the significance of the SuperchainERC20 standard.
Consider expanding the description to include:
- The relationship between SuperchainERC20 and the broader Ethereum ecosystem.
- The key benefits this standard brings to developers and users.
- A brief mention of how it differs from traditional ERC20 tokens.
20-20
: Correct preposition usage.Replace "on" with "of" for better grammatical accuracy.
Apply this change:
-* **Permissionless propagation**: Easily clone an existing token contract to a new OP Stack chain using `create2` without requiring the original owner, which enables movement of assets to the new chain once Interop goes live. Importantly, permissionless propagation retains the integrity of the original owner on the contract and preserves security but proliferates the contract's availability to new chains. +* **Permissionless propagation**: Easily clone an existing token contract to a new OP Stack chain using `create2` without requiring the original owner, which enables movement of assets to the new chain once Interop goes live. Importantly, permissionless propagation retains the integrity of the original owner of the contract and preserves security but proliferates the contract's availability to new chains.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The preposition ‘of’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...ins the integrity of the original owner on the contract and preserves security but...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_ON_OF)
68-68
: Add missing articles for clarity.Include "the" before "same address" and "create2 function" for better readability.
Apply these changes:
-2. Deployment at same address on every chain in the Superchain using `create2` function. +2. Deployment at the same address on every chain in the Superchain using the `create2` function.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~68-~68: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...andcrosschainBurn
. 2. Deployment at same address on every chain in the Superchai...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~68-~68: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... on every chain in the Superchain usingcreate2
function. For now, application...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
70-70
: Improve wording for clarity.The current wording could be more concise and clear.
Consider rephrasing the sentence as follows:
-For now, application developers should view `SuperchainERC20`as standard ERC20 tokens with additional built-in functions that allow cross-chain asset movement that will be enabled once Interop goes live. +For now, application developers should view `SuperchainERC20` tokens as standard ERC20 tokens with additional built-in functions for cross-chain asset movement, which will be enabled once Interop goes live.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1)
Pattern
**/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for headers, buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- Use sentence case for H1, H2, and H3 headers, capitalizing only the first word and any proper nouns.
- For all headers (H1, H2, H3), do not change the capitalization of proper nouns; keep them as they are.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The preposition ‘of’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...ins the integrity of the original owner on the contract and preserves security but...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_ON_OF)
[uncategorized] ~68-~68: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...andcrosschainBurn
. 2. Deployment at same address on every chain in the Superchai...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~68-~68: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... on every chain in the Superchain usingcreate2
function. For now, application...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1)
1-80
: Overall, excellent introduction to SuperchainERC20 Token Standard.This document provides a comprehensive and well-structured overview of the SuperchainERC20 Token Standard. It effectively covers key aspects such as features, implementation details, and comparisons to other standards. The use of visual aids (Mermaid diagram) and callouts enhances the content's clarity. With the suggested minor improvements, this document will serve as an excellent resource for developers and users interested in the SuperchainERC20 standard.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The preposition ‘of’ seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...ins the integrity of the original owner on the contract and preserves security but...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_ON_OF)
[uncategorized] ~68-~68: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...andcrosschainBurn
. 2. Deployment at same address on every chain in the Superchai...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~68-~68: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... on every chain in the Superchain usingcreate2
function. For now, application...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
Co-authored-by: Skeletor Spaceman <92943766+skeletor-spaceman@users.noreply.github.com>