Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put exercises into a logical order #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2015

Conversation

mbertheau
Copy link
Contributor

I tried to come up with a logical order of exercises. This is what I ended up with.

I changed the order on https://github.com/exercism/xracket/wiki/Order-of-exercises as well to reflect.

@arguello
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good - thanks!

@yurrriq - what do you think?

@yurrriq
Copy link
Member

yurrriq commented Aug 26, 2015

Maybe swap rna-transcription and anagram so hamming and rna-transcription are back-to-back. Otherwise it's hard to argue with the logic here. I like the categorizing in the wiki.

@mbertheau
Copy link
Contributor Author

I put anagram between the two for students that grew tired of dna and rna. I can see however how passion goes both ways :)

@arguello - your call :)

@yurrriq
Copy link
Member

yurrriq commented Aug 26, 2015

"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." LGTM

@arguello
Copy link
Contributor

cool

arguello added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2015
Put exercises into a logical order
@arguello arguello merged commit 8370d1c into exercism:master Aug 26, 2015
@wobh
Copy link

wobh commented Aug 26, 2015

Two resources I find myself referring to often:

I've been wondering about organizing exercises into one or more trees by themes, topics, and maybe even characters, situations, or subjects.

@kytrinyx
Copy link
Member

@wobh did I link you to this discussion? exercism/problem-specifications#63

@kytrinyx
Copy link
Member

Also worth noting: there's a "todo" keyword in the problems api: http://x.exercism.io/tracks/racket

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants