replace uglify-es with uglify-js #661
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
Ashoat
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2021
|
This will also help fix #645 |
|
Should we be using uglify-js or terser? |
|
@rh389 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
|
@rh389 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
|
@rh389 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Replace uglify-es with uglify-js because of deprecation message from uglify-es
closes #644
Test plan
CI is green