We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When I ran the same simulation with pmcx and mcx I got different ouputs.
I traced the difference to a difference in the volume loading:
mcx applies a units factor when loading a MEDIA_AS_F2H volume:
MEDIA_AS_F2H
mcx/src/mcx_utils.c
Lines 3237 to 3238 in d6c1f55
while pmcx does not apply this factor:
mcx/src/pmcx.cpp
Lines 307 to 308 in d6c1f55
When I added this factor to pmcx then the simulation outputs were the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
unitinmm
parseVolume()
188f7ee
fix continuous media scaling issue,pmcxcl 0.1.2, fangq/mcx#185
507b37b
both mcxlab and pmcx should be fixed. please update your pmcx to 0.2.4 to test.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into latest_master
002f5a6
- version 0.2.4 of pmcx with fix for fangq#185
No branches or pull requests
When I ran the same simulation with pmcx and mcx I got different ouputs.
I traced the difference to a difference in the volume loading:
mcx applies a units factor when loading a
MEDIA_AS_F2H
volume:mcx/src/mcx_utils.c
Lines 3237 to 3238 in d6c1f55
while pmcx does not apply this factor:
mcx/src/pmcx.cpp
Lines 307 to 308 in d6c1f55
When I added this factor to pmcx then the simulation outputs were the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: